After transferring to excel X-axis data and Y-axis data both fall into one cell, only one comma separates them so that.If you’re looking for a tutorial on breaking an axis scale, you won’t find it here. Deleted the bogus data series and bingo - the final x-axis value appeared.I have a question about WebPlotDigitizer. Of course it had no x-axis value specified, so therefore it did not have the same value as the rest of the lines. So because I had no name for the series and no data, there was no line to click on, so I didn't know it was there.Usually they ask because a few very large values (for instance, Paris in June or Madrid in May in the chart below) overwhelm the other, relatively much smaller, values.Most chart types have two axes: a horizontal axis (or x-axis) and a vertical axis (or y-axis). People frequently ask how to show vastly different values in a single chart. The fix for this is to add a blank row above and below the chart data area and extend the. Now, after that step you may find the right and left columns to be cut off in an unpleasant way.For scientific data presented to scientific audiences, this is often an excellent suggestion. Select the range A1:B7.One suggestion is to use a logarithmic scale. To create a column chart, execute the following steps.The primary (left) axis now has a minimum of -40 million and a maximum of +40 million the secondary (right) axis now has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 16 million.Add the secondary horizontal axis. I have rescaled the vertical axes. They block the primary axis data…… but if I format the secondary axis series with outlines and no fills, you can see the primary axis data.Back to solid fill colors. By default, all series are plotted on the primary axis.The second step is to move the three extra series to the secondary axis. Columns E, F, and G have the same data as columns B, C, and D, except the two very large values (>30 million) have been replaced by cut-off values of 7,500,000 (shaded cells).The first step is to plot all of the data in one chart. In this chart, the gradient at the tops of the (truncated) large values are not meaningless, but are intended to show the large values extending high up into the clouds.If you want to play along at home, the data is located in BrokenYData.csv.Here is the data for the chart.
Microsoft Excel Why Does My X Axis Not Pull Series And BingoEach comma knocks a set of three zeros off the displayed value, making for example 1,000,000 appear as 1. This makes the added axis cross at zero, at the bottom of the chart.(The primary horizontal axis also crosses at zero, but that’s in the middle of the chart, since the primary vertical axis scale goes from negative to positive.)Now we need to apply custom number formats to the vertical axes.The primary (left) axis gets a format of 0,"M" (zero, comma, comma, and capital M within double quotes). Pretty strange, but we’ll fix that in a moment.Format the secondary vertical axis (right of chart), and change the Crosses At setting to Automatic. The semicolon with nothing following means that any other numbers will not be displayed.Now I’ve cleaned up a bit. This means that any values less than 8 million will appear as the number of millions folloewd by capital M. The first format in the string is normally for positive numbers, but square brackets indicate a non-default condition for the first string. Since no special format is indicated for zero (which would be after a second semicolon), it is shown with the same format as a positive number.The secondary (right) axis gets the trickier format of 0,"M" (less than eight million enclosed in square brackets, zero, comma, comma, and capital M within double quotes). The semicolon indicates that this format is for positive values, and nothing after the semicolon indicates that negative values are not to be shown. Super bounce out downloadThe top panel shows that the two outlying values are drastically larger than the others, while the bottom panel allows comparison between the smaller values.I know everybody’s case is special, and everybody knows better than I do about why using improper techniques is correct in their particular situation. To delete an unwanted legend entry, click once to select the legend, then click again to select the particular legend entry, then press the Delete key.This is the finished panel chart. This gradient makes the bars extend upward, and fade as they reached into the clouds.Finally I deleted the duplicate legend entries. To format just one point in a series, click once to select the series, then click again to select the particular point (column) to format.I used a gradient that had white fill at 0%, and column’s regular fill color at 15% and at 100%. The primary and secondary axis scales conveniently have the right spacing so that the primary horizontal gridlines work for the secondary axis as well.Now I’ve applied the same fill colors to the secondary axis columns as are used for the primary axis columns.Finally I’ve formatted the two large values separately. I’ve also set the labels of the primary horizontal axis (center of the chart) to No Labels, because they are redundant and clutter up the chart. The time inbetween the two measurements has no relevance and the second measurement could have been taken directly after the first but it wasn’t. Due to the type of measurement it is, I need to quote the times correctly (And so can’t just move one forward by modifying the time data). However for the problem I currently have, that isn’t a problem and I still need to split the axis.I have two measurements that were taken over two system configurations and hence at two different times between 10am and 11am for the first and between 6pm and 7pm for the second. However, I am under no obligation to share something that I do not want to share. I do not even have the old tutorial, so I cannot send it to you, nor will I recreate a new version of the tutorial.Your explanation looks very good and I totally agree with you for a bar chart application that you shouldn’t split the axis as it distorts the image. It also matters that I explain why certain techniques are or are not appropriate. Most pages that cited my old tutorial also cited others, usually several others, and I’m sure the search engines listed the others as well.Was it tedious to read the rationale against using this technique? Or was it more tedious to be faced with the thought that the technique you wanted to use is frowned upon by visualization experts?“it does not matter whether you think its not an appropriate way to communicate data”On the contrary, it matters a great deal (at least to me) that what I write about are in fact what I consider appropriate approaches to communicate data. It was more tedious to set up a redirect, so visitors at least learn that there is no longer such a page and also read the rationale for its removal.I can’t believe it was more tedious to find similar tutorials than to land on this page. I don’t think the alternative you suggest is relevent for a time domain plot.Do you know any other alternatives to splitting the axis in this case? Can you provide advice or links to your previous page showing how to split the axis?“it is somewhat tedious to remove a tutorial…”It was not tedious at all to remove the tutorial in question. Therefore if I was to split the graph it would not be distorted by the way you suggest for bar charts. At that point, I then explained that it meant the bars ‘faded’ into the top panel, and they all (except for the one who liked the panel plot better) then stated that that was an even lousier explanation. So yes, they were very observant and immediately saw the gradient, and decided that it was just a lousy graphics job from the author. Only the bachelor’s researcher liked the panel plot and every other one (unprompted and without knowing the responses from the others) pointed out that it was very confusing to have to continuously jump up and down between the two panels, and that the fading gradient only made it look like the printer had screwed up, not that those two bars were somehow marked as different. I actually found this page for completely unrelated reasons and was simply bemused by the comments.For the record, I showed your two plots to the research group I’m in and the one next door (N=9 2 undergaduates, 1 bachelors researcher, 1 MD/PhD student, 1 Masters student, 1 Masters researcher, and 3 PhDs each of very different generations).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorBobby ArchivesCategories |